Skilled but Soulless: The Myth of the 'Effective' Bad Leader
Can You Be a Good Leader Without Being a Good Person?
No.
A good person is just. Can you imagine a leader who is skilled but unjust? Such a person might enrich themselves at the expense of others, scapegoat subordinates, or delegate only the most difficult tasks without sharing the burden. That’s not leadership—that’s exploitation.
A good person is wise. Can you imagine a leader who is capable but unwise? I can’t—and neither could Euripides, who said, “Ten soldiers wisely led will beat a hundred without a head.” A leader without wisdom might never seek counsel, read about leadership, or understand the realities on the frontlines. They may act impulsively, disconnected from the consequences of their decisions.
A good leader practices moderation. Can you imagine a leader with no self-restraint? Thucydides couldn’t: “Of all manifestations of power, self-restraint impresses men most.” Who wants to follow someone who yells, threatens, or becomes emotionally unhinged under pressure?
A good leader is courageous. Can you imagine a cowardly leader? One who avoids tough decisions, shies away from difficult conversations, or refuses to admit mistakes?
Leadership is a burden because it means being responsible for many. A bad person in a leadership role, no matter how skilled, connected, or privileged, will inevitably create suffering. “Good leader who is a bad person” is an oxymoron.
To become a good leader, start by leading yourself. Practice virtue. If you don’t, your desires, emotions, and unresolved issues will lead you instead.